Talk:Origin of the Albanians
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
|
||||||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
Winnifrith: "The lack of interest among Slavs for the barren mountains of Northern Albania would explain the survival of Albanian as a language"
[edit]So, why are there Slavs in the Carpathians, Alps, Montenegro or Bulgaria? Bebe Mușat (talk) 11:35, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Restructuring the article: Y/N?
[edit]Looking at the way this article is structured, I can't help but notice somewhat of a difference to how the one on the Origin of the Romanians is structured, in particular how that article's section "Theories on the Romanians' ethnogenesis" goes about explaining the theories by first going through the historiography, and then naming theories as "continuity", &c.
Meanwhile, this article lets linguistic considerations take up a lot of space without (from what I've seen) structuring it as "pro-continuity"/"pro-immigrationist" (or something along those lines), which I for once deem not as, uh... "überschaubar" is really the word I'm looking for here (though it might just be me, who knows).
Is there a consensus on whether the above might be taken into consideration, so that the article would then be restructured in a more easily legible way, e.g.
Theories on the Albanians' ethnogenesis
>Historiography: origin of the theories
>Theories of Illyrian/Western Paleo-Balkan continuity
>Immigrationist theories
>Obsolete theories
Anyways, thank you to anyone reading this for taking the time to do so. Lephilologueserbe (talk) 14:30, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
Ancent dna reveals origin of albanians
[edit]Why is a pre print which is not peer reviewed on here Jamesjakson10 (talk) 18:09, 3 March 2025 (UTC) ( Blocked sockpuppet of Hssstrt, see investigation)
- Sockpuppet makes reasonable complaint? First time for everything I suppose... Tewdar 23:30, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
- C-Class Albania articles
- High-importance Albania articles
- WikiProject Albania articles
- C-Class Ethnic groups articles
- Mid-importance Ethnic groups articles
- WikiProject Ethnic groups articles
- C-Class Illyria articles
- Low-importance Illyria articles
- All WikiProject Illyria pages
- C-Class history articles
- Mid-importance history articles
- WikiProject History articles
- C-Class Linguistics articles
- Low-importance Linguistics articles
- WikiProject Linguistics articles
- C-Class Classical Greece and Rome articles
- Low-importance Classical Greece and Rome articles
- All WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome pages
- C-Class Europe articles
- Low-importance Europe articles
- WikiProject Europe articles
- C-Class European history articles
- Low-importance European history articles
- All WikiProject European history pages
- C-Class Middle Ages articles
- Low-importance Middle Ages articles
- All WikiProject Middle Ages pages