Parts of this page are related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a restricted topic. You are not an extended-confirmed user, so you must not edit or discuss this topic anywhere on Wikipedia except to make an edit request. (Additional details are in the message box just below this one.)
Administrators may disregard the above message.
You are seeing this because of the limitations of {{If extended confirmed}} and {{If administrator}}. You can hide this message box by adding the following to a new line of your common.css page:
.ECR-edit-request-warning{display:none;}
Warning: active arbitration remedies
The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. Parts of this article relate to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing the parts of the page related to the contentious topic:
You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic
All participants in formal discussions (RfCs, RMs, etc) within the area of conflict are urged to keep their comments concise, and are limited to 1,000 words per discussion. Citations and quotations (whether from sources, Wikipedia articles, Wikipedia discussions, or elsewhere) do not count toward the word limit.
If it is unclear which parts of the page are related to this contentious topic, the content in question should be marked within the wiki text by an invisible comment. If no comment is present, please ask an administrator for assistance. If in doubt it is better to assume that the content is covered.
Further information
The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:
Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.
With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:
Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish historyWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish historyTemplate:WikiProject Jewish historyJewish history-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination
This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Asia, which aims to improve the quality and status of all South Asia-related articles. For more information, please visit the Project page.South AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject South AsiaTemplate:WikiProject South AsiaSouth Asia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arab world, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Arab world on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Arab worldWikipedia:WikiProject Arab worldTemplate:WikiProject Arab worldArab world
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology
List of events named pogrom was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 18 February 2014 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Pogrom. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Description of suggested change: The characterization of these events as Pogroms is debated and they are given undue weight by including in the lede. Even the Wikipedia article for the Huwara rampage does not use the word Pogrom in the title, nor the October 7 Hamas-led attack on Israel. The lede should only be for events that are definitively described as Pogroms, events such as these can be included in the body.
Not done For the 2008 attacks, the text does not state in wikivoice that it was a pogrom, it states that it was labeled as a pogrom by Olmert, which is verified by reliable sources that directly quote the Israeli Prime Minister's description (not even remotely undue weight). ⇒SWATJesterShoot Blues, Tell VileRat!05:09, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'll note as well that we have plentyofreliablesources using the term "Huwara pogrom", and the Wall Street Journal link provided above is attributed on it's claim that October 7th was a pogrom; so by the standard you're seeking to impose there doesn't appear to be any actual issue here. ⇒SWATJesterShoot Blues, Tell VileRat!05:47, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The argument isn't for removing these from the page, just from the Lede. These seems very cherry picked in a list of dozens of pogroms to include events that historical debate over the term Pogrom is still ongoing. Why are these relevant enough to be chosen to be in the lede? Lavipao (talk) 21:27, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Description of suggested change: This is an unsourced claim. The source lists one person, Olmert, calling this a Pogrom. There is no proof provided that this is a common name for the event
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Description of suggested change: Add to lede please! This has been widely reported as the most recent Pogrom in Europe
Diff:
−
+
The [[November 2024 Amsterdam Riots]], in which violence took place between fans of Maccabi Tel Aviv and AFC Ajax that resulted in 20-30 injuries, was characterized as a Pogrom by many Israeli and Dutch authors including [[King Willem-Alexander of the Netherlands]].
Silkoff: Israeli people plus Wilders describe it as a pogrom, and also "many".
Jerus. Post: Israeli people describe it as a pogrom.
Telegraaf. An editor, in her column, describes it as a pogrom. Nowhere is there mention of the king describing it in these words, and actually, kings always being very careful when they talk about sensitive matters, it would surprise me greatly if he would have done that. But that is just my opinion. If you have a source for the king saying this, I'll add it to the text. (I won't add it to the text, because first there has to be consensus that this was a pogrom. See below.)
Aha! Now I found November 2024 Amsterdam riots. Okay. This was a riot between football supporters. Maccabi supporters sang "fuck you Palestine", chased two men, beat one them with a belt, ripped Palestinian flags off, etc. (All from the WP page). Later, they in turn were chased and subjected to violence. Several people used the word "pogrom" but for example the mayor of Amsterdam regretted that she had used that word. She criticised Israeli and Dutch politicians for framing the violence as targeted attacks on Israelis by local Moroccans and Palestinians. She also said she had not been warned about Maccabi Tel Aviv supporters' history as "ultra-nationalists" before the match and called for an independent inquiry into the incident.
Not done Before adding text about these riots to the page pogroms, there should be consensus amongst editors that this was in fact a pogrom. A WP:RfC should decide, and I won't initiate this. Lova Falk (talk) 15:34, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
^Koutsoukis, Jason (15 September 2008). "Settlers attack Palestinian village". The Sydney Morning Herald. Archived from the original on 5 April 2023. Retrieved 14 November 2023. 'As a Jew, I was ashamed at the scenes of Jews opening fire at innocent Arabs in Hebron. There is no other definition than the term "pogrom" to describe what I have seen.'
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Not done For the 2008 attacks, the text does not state in wikivoice that it was a pogrom, it states that it was labeled as a pogrom by Olmert, which is verified by reliable sources that directly quote the Israeli Prime Minister's description (not even remotely undue weight). ⇒SWATJester Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat! 05:09, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
Done I believe that source is actually referring to the previous statement, so this is in fact unsourced. -- Lenny Marks (talk) 14:40, 4 March 2025 (UTC)