Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Wikipedia:RFP)
    Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.

    Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection)

    After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here



    Current requests for increase in protection level

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

    Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


    Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from IP & sock abuse inserting Ukrainian heritage. sock ip ip 2 ip 3 . TiggerJay(talk) 06:37, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing and Sockpuppetry. Kajmer05 (talk) 08:26, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:CT/A-I. Leonidlednev (TCL) 08:27, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Aqurs1 (talk) 08:44, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: The Janata Party article has been repeatedly targeted by high levels of IP vandalism, particularly from mobile IPs and IPv6 addresses, even after being protected for a month. To prevent further disruption and maintain the integrity of the page, I request extended protection. The party is one of India’s oldest, with Navneet Chaturvedi as its current president. Kumar Amans (talk) 09:03, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite move protection: Highly visible page. Vitaium (talk) 10:58, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. No record of problematic moves; no record of any moves, in fact. El_C 20:26, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – I'm actually unfamiliar with editing in this area (re Israel/Palestine-related issues), but have noticed the ARBPIA template being used on a few talk pages, so am just submitting this here as this seems a likely candidate, given the current hot topic re antisemitic attacks in Australia at the moment. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 11:43, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:12, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Page appears to be targeted by a user who is imitating BMX on WheeIs and Supreme Genghis Khan 24.55.33.220 (talk) 20:36, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: High level of IP vandalism Tonyy Starkk (talk) 12:56, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Per WP:GSCASTE, disruptive editing by IPs belonging to LTA Truthfindervert. - Ratnahastin (talk) 13:09, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent tampering with the long standing result by new users/IPs, possible sockpuppetry. HistoryofIran (talk) 14:16, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Yup, there is definitely some sockpuppetry involved. At least the IP 31.146.123.47 is User:CeRcVa13. I'll file an SPI later today when I have time. HistoryofIran (talk) 14:18, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Controversial Subject Sunflowerlilies (talk) 16:50, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Yes, a contentious topicWP:KURDS—but no pressing issues at the time of writing. El_C 20:42, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Straddles between a lot of contentious topics. BangJan1999 17:44, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. If anything, this is a candidate for full protection due to the content dispute. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:22, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Disruptive editing. ♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 19:51, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:18, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – edit war between fans in putting their favourite actor first in order. Aadirulez8 (talk) 19:52, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: I request semi-protection for a sensitive topic that might get harassed. PawWiki (talk) 19:54, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 20:03, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: An IP user known as "80.208.68.164" has been adding nonsense into the page since October. Wheatley2 (speak to me) (watch me) 23:11, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Trailblazer101 (talk) 23:31, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent recreation/reversion of redirection by IPs. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 23:47, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – a short-term block would be helpful to stop the IP onslaught as he is in a transfer rumor. FMSky (talk) 00:06, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 00:29, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopper hoaxing context of an image. Jalen Barks (Woof) 00:09, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User(s) blocked. Both IPs blocked 1 week. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 00:28, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for reduction in protection level

    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Reason: Wikipedia, the article about itself has been indefinitely extended confirmed protected for nearly 1 year now (since March of 2024). This was in light of a sockpuppet who kept on vandalizing the article. I think that given the long timeframe, the person running the sockpuppet has likely lost interest in Wikipedia (no way he would be monitoring the page for an entire year just to vandalize it again and for it to be protected once more). GIven the few amount of users that have Extended Confirmed status and that it is the most important article on the website, it should be downgraded to indefinite Autoconfirmed Protection. SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 05:26, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. — Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:11, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for edits to a protected page

    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.


    Add that 80 Palestinians in Gaza have been killed since the “ceasefire” began (i.e. genocide direct deaths have continued albeit at a slower pace) https://www.dropsitenews.com/p/death-and-destruction-returning-to-rafah https://news.antiwar.com/2025/01/29/israeli-forces-have-killed-more-than-80-palestinians-in-gaza-since-ceasefire-went-into-effect/ Seahumidity (talk) 09:46, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Add info about 35 year reduction in life expectancy according to UPenn study http://www.thedp.com/article/2025/01/penn-study-gaza-life-expectancy-drop Seahumidity (talk) 10:53, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    I want to talk the on discussion page about the name of the conflict Xenomire (talk) 20:07, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Handled requests

    A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.